Assessment of the practicality and safety of thrombolysis with anistreplase given by general practitioners.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Recent guidelines recommend that patients with obvious acute myocardial infarction receive thrombolysis, unless contraindicated, within 60-90 minutes of summoning assistance. If this target is to be achieved, an increasing number of general practitioners are likely to be involved in the administration of thrombolytic agents. AIM This study aimed to assess the practicality and safety of thrombolysis with anistreplase when given by general practitioners. METHOD An observational study was conducted in 805 general practices throughout the United Kingdom. Between March 1991 and September 1992, a total of 3383 patients with a clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction were recruited--888 by 344 general practitioners who wished to include anistreplase in their management of myocardial infarction ('user' group) and 2495 by 776 general practitioners who did not wish to use anistreplase but who were willing to provide information about their cases ('comparison' group). RESULTS More than half the patients were seen within two hours of onset of symptoms. A high frequency of contra-indications to thrombolysis, diagnostic uncertainty, and other, mainly practical, reasons limited the number of occasions on which anistreplase was administered. Thus, only 310 patients were given anistreplase in the community. The general practitioners in the study used anistreplase safely. Their diagnostic accuracy was high (of the 310 patients given anistreplase 69% had a definite, possible or probably myocardial infarction, 4% a definite non-cardiac diagnosis), the number of patients given anistreplase in spite of a documented contraindication was small (seven patients), and the doctors appeared to be aware of potential bleeding problems associated with thrombolysis. In all cases, the complications of acute myocardial infarction appeared to be managed appropriately. CONCLUSION General practitioners can use anistreplase both appropriately and safely in the early management of acute myocardial infarction. Recognized contraindications to thrombolysis and practicalities of diagnosis and drug administration may, however, limit the number of occasions on which anistreplase is used.
منابع مشابه
Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners: Grampian region early anistreplase trial. GREAT Group.
OBJECTIVE To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners. DESIGN Randomised double blind parallel group trial of anistreplase 30 units intravenously and placebo given either at home or in hospital. SETTING 29 rural practices in Grampian admitting patients to teaching hospitals in Aberdeen (average distance 36 (range 16-62) miles). PATI...
متن کاملAn economic evaluation of thrombolysis in a remote rural community.
OBJECTIVES To assess the cost effectiveness of community thrombolysis relative to hospital thrombolysis by investigating the extra costs and benefits of a policy of community thrombolysis, then establishing the extra cost per life saved by community thrombolysis. DESIGN Economic evaluation based on the results of the Grampian region early anistreplase trial. SETTING 29 rural general practic...
متن کاملGREAT: 10 year survival of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction in a randomised comparison of prehospital and hospital thrombolysis.
The Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT) assessed the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of prehospital thrombolysis given by general practitioners. This treatment was shown to be feasible and safe in their hands, and at one year a halving of mortality was reported (p = 0.007). Seven other small randomised trials comparing prehospital with hospital thrombolysis have been published, a...
متن کاملAudit of prehospital thrombolysis by general practitioners in peripheral practices in Grampian.
BACKGROUND In the Grampian region early anistreplase trial (GREAT), domiciliary thrombolysis by general practitioners was associated with a halving of one year mortality compared with hospital administration. However, after completion of the trial and publication of the results, the use of this treatment by general practitioners declined sharply. OBJECTIVE To increase the proportion of eligib...
متن کاملThrombolytic therapy in Europe: current status.
Thrombolytic therapy is a practical, effective approach to the management of acute myocardial infarction that is widely used in Europe today. Early European trials demonstrated a clear reduction in mortality in patients who received thrombolytic therapy compared with those given conventional treatment. The findings of experimental studies suggest that early reperfusion of the infarct-related ar...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
دوره 45 393 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995